Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnam Staff Service Medal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam Staff Service Medal[edit]

Vietnam Staff Service Medal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources to establish notability. Unreferenced since October 2006. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:49, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- I think this is a record-breaker of Longest Time to not be referenced by any sources, wow Audi1merc2 (talk) 15:22, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep if any sources at all can be found to confirm its existence, although it seems unlikely it's a hoax. We have articles on pretty much every other medal ever awarded. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Officially established medal of South Vietnam during the era of the Vietnam War. Appears in every awards regulation manual I have ever seen detailing foreign awards authorized to United States military service medals [1] as it was in the top ten Vietnam service medals awarded to US military members. Google alone has 186,000 page hits and several hundred image hits [2]. -O.R.Comms 22:45, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, enough to meet the guidelines, but REALLY needs some WP:RS sources to support the article. Kierzek (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.