Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VideoWave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VideoWave[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:GNG. Furthermore an obsolete article. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coverage in Cnet, the Wall Street Journal and tech crunch, seems GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 17:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Easily passes WP:GNG. Adding to the above list of sources by Oaktree b, there is are reviews in PC Magazine, The Guardian, Popular Science, and others. Twinkle1990, it is considered best practices to do a WP:BEFORE search prior to nominating an article for deletion. Netherzone (talk) 17:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reviews in WSJ, CNet, techcrunch pass WP:GNG. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plenty of coverage as listed above. Furthermore, what is an "obsolete article"?

DonaldD23 talk to me 19:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.