Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VideoGet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 22:59, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VideoGet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable product. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Weak - Covered by CNet, mentioned amongst various places of the intertubes. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 03:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there are worthwhile reviews of Videoget on the "intertubes", I can't find them amongst the download links and SEO. Cnet's coverage appears limited to this, which is only slightly reworded from the developer's page and can't be considered independent. —Korath (Talk) 03:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I cannot find significant coverage either. --George (talk) 19:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was going to avoid this discussion because it is overwhelmingly delete already. I am stating delete specifically because ContinueWithCaution attemped to use such trivial examples of sources. We need to stop pretending that random mentions on places like CNet are notable. Miami33139 (talk) 20:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.