Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidarbha Chandika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vidarbha Chandika[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously PRODed by me as "Claims no notability. Fails WP:GNG." Later @SwisterTwister: CSDed it as A7 No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events). Both CSD and PROD declined by @Espresso Addict: as "Declining speedy; not suitable article for A7; also deprodding. Long-standing article, website provides adequate verification of existence".
If proven existence meant notability, Wikipedia is gonna be doomed soon. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-How could ever be existence=notability?Fails WP:GNG.Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 10:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no suggestion of notability/impact Spiderone 17:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.