Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicuna (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 18:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vicuna (album)[edit]

Have tagged the band Nuclear Rabbit for deletion, am also tagging this page, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 10#Nuclear Rabbit for ins and outs, but the band page has been deleted a number of times via speedy and so it makes sense that if that is the status quo this page should likely be deleted too. Hiding T 21:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC) Hiding T 21:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should wait to see what happens on Nuclear Rabbit before we trash this one.GreenRunner0 22:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't see any real reason too. This can be deleted or redirected even if that is kept. Otherwise it become a circular argument. Hiding T 22:45, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It would help the 'keep' argument (for both band and album) if some sources for the reception of the album could be added to its article. Was it reviewed? Did anyone buy it, etc. Occuli (talk) 23:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even if the band is kept this is not notable. There is essentially nothing to merge, either. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.