Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory Family Centre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DeleteMandsford 22:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Victory Family Centre[edit]
- Victory Family Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article with huge COI, promotional and notability problems. Article was created by a member, recently whitewashed by another member, and is mainly used as a vehicle to promote them and their message. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 03:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this is not my AFD, I'm good-faith submitting it for the IP who wanted it. tedder (talk) 01:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, can't find any RS nor indeed any secondary sources at all. Roscelese (talk) 03:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Megachurches are liable to be notable. Unfortunately this article does not indicate how mega. It also reads too like an Advert. If rewritten with a NPOV and more detail on its size, it might possibly be worth keeping. However, its title should be Victory Family Centre, Singapore, as no doubt there will be other similarly named churches. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.