Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Zdrok

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Zdrok[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blp1e - notable only for her divorce and subsequent legal battles, fails pornbio. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T/C) 20:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per sources provided by Morbidthoughts - Notability is most certainly there so keep. –Davey2010^Talk 12:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Ummn she's more notable for being a model and a frequently quoted therapist than a divorce as made clear by [1][2][3][4][5][6] Was there an attempt to follow WP:BEFORE before nominating? Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:48, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: In light of new sources.....
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 06:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- "a frequently quoted therapist" is not a sufficient claim to notability; we'd need sources about the subject to meet WP:SIGCOV not what they say in the medial. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, please. What you are requiring contravenes WP:ACADEMIC criteria #7 and WP:BIO under Academics. Reliable sources about the subject then, [7][8][[9][10][11], even if the coverage isn't exactly tasteful. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1994. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 10:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wouldn't the fact that she was selected as 2004 Penthouse Pet of the Year, etc. meet WP:PORNBIO? - GretLomborg (talk) 04:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've not seen Pet of the Year used as a qualifying award under PORNBIO. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:50, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Possible notability on many fronts. I disagree that this individual is only notable due to their divorce. @GretLomborg: While we don't have an article on every Penthouse Pet of the Year, I know we have an article for most Playboy Playmate of the Year (~40/60) and at least a section for them in their respective years within playmate of the month lists (~20/60). — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.