Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Yeates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 & all that fun stuff (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 16:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Yeates[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Okay, not sure about notability here. I looked her up and yes she has a few shows but it does not seem like a lot. Too soon? She does have a following it says, but not sure how much. Wgolf (talk) 03:06, 9 March 2015 (UTC) withdraw[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Not much out there but I did come across this here, she's playing opposite Susannah York, so Yeates is a real actress, getting good roles. Plus in-depth commentary here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep New article that does need serious expanding and sourcing. A quick Google search brings up enough to expand it. AlbinoFerret 03:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above - The article is piss poor but Google News brings up a few news articles on her so should do for now. –Davey2010^Talk 16:04, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw-Okay so looks like she can keep her article per what others have said. Wgolf (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.