Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Balomenos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clear NFOOTY pass, no outstanding delete votes and no reasonable chance of any other outcome. Fenix down (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Balomenos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and has played only a few games in a non-fully-professional league not listed at WP:FPL, failing WP:NFOOTBALL. Geschichte (talk) 16:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 17:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - has international caps so is notable. Needs improving urgently. Giant Snowman 16:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, be our guest GiantSnowman :) --SuperJew (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Keep Passes WP:NFOOTY as has several international caps. Number 5 7 20:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG and a basic Google search. Article refs need to be improved + article expanded to include her Matildas appearances as well. ref "WP:NFOOTY failure"? Ok, sure. For the record, the majority of top women's football (soccer) leagues are excluded from WP:FPL. A look at the essay's contribution history will shed light on why that is. See also WP:WOSO. Hmlarson (talk) 22:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Quite happy to change my !vote if she does have appearances for the national team, but the reference provided is a pre-match piece that only shows she was in a squad, not that she's actually played. Number 5 7 23:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [edit conflict]. Even by the dubious and sexist standards of WP:NFOOTY her appearance in seven international matches on the 2008 Australian National Team, scoring goals in three of them [1] is a pass. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - has caps so has played at the highest possible level Spiderone 23:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly satisfies WP:NFOOTY. Seany91 (talk) 09:05, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per keep votes. HandsomeBoy (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly passes WP:NFOOTY, having represented the senior Australian team. Also her knee injury was serious and notable enough to be mentioned in two The Advertiser articles: [2], [3] and I would argue she passes WP:GNG regardless of her international caps. --SuperJew (talk) 16:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes NFOOTY clearly.--Ortizesp (talk) 07:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.