Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Allegranza
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Victoria Allegranza[edit]
- Victoria Allegranza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod contested. AFD reason is the same as the PROD reason: "Notability appears marginal (at best). An IP says that the subject does not want this information to be here. In such cases of marginal notability, I generally think its best to give the subject what they want." TexasAndroid (talk) 04:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 05:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 05:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, marginal notability not well-established by any WP:RS. --Kinu t/c 06:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Unreferenced BLP except for the subject homepage, not seeing any reliable hits (IMBD-like) coming up. Too early for an entry, I think. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.