Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicki Robin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vicki Robin[edit]

Vicki Robin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have just tried to improve this article, renewed the ref needed banner, added ref needed tags, but have to wonder if this is an article that really meets WP:NOTABILITY and WP:BLP standards. Other than self-published sources and what appear to be totally unreliable sources per Wikipedia requirements for BLPs, I don't think this article is really appropriate on its own. Perhaps it could be merged into an article on the one co-authored best-seller itself? I don't necessarily want to see it nuked, but ... I just don't see how it can be redeemed. -- WV 23:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought, too, but didn't want to act in haste. Mostly brought it here to see if others saw what I did. -- WV 23:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 16:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 08:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.