Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vian State Bank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vian State Bank[edit]
- Vian State Bank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
contested prod. Impossible to make much sense of this article - it's basically just a dump of some random material on the author's personal archive site. It consists of an out of date news item about a bank name change eleven years ago, some irrelevant info about other banks and an irrelevant link to a minor court case in 1931. Not speediable but it fails every measure of notability I can think of and is useless as an encyclopedia article. andy (talk) 14:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See also this afd. andy (talk) 14:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable and fairly nonsensical as well. Alberon (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I might reconsider if the article received a complete rewrite during the AfD period. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Me too, but given the author's attitude to problems with previous articles that's pretty unlikely. Anyway there are pretty few ghits for the subject and none of them look like evidence of notability. andy (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the author has made a huge number of recent edits in response to this afd and many, many comments on his talk page, but I can't see anything that changes my opinion about the grounds for deletion. andy (talk) 21:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 16:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I see no evidence of notability. -- BPMullins | Talk 17:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.