Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ViSenze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes 08:44, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ViSenze[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient sources for notability on its own. DGG ( talk ) 02:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think this is notable enough. Beasting123 (talk) 03:51, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Two of the four provided references are links to the NExT++ research centre and National University of Singapore rather than the firm that is the subject of the article, and the remainder are standard Crunchbase listing and a funding announcement: routine coverage. Singapore's Business Press included the firm's CEO among 4 participants in a questionnaire [1] and has a passing mention of research by "ViSenze, a visual search company" [2], and the University site has a recent brief item on the company ("Picture perfect: How a Singapore startup’s AI technology is partnering Japanese retail giants"), but neither these nor anything else found by search is sufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 08:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.