Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ViPi project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
ViPi project[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ViPi project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. I couldn't find anything that could be called significant coverage. PepperBeast (talk) 12:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability, Internet, and Europe. PepperBeast (talk) 12:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: A lot of the links are dead or 404. WP:BEFORE (web) brings many primary references. As per nom, no WP:SIGCOV ... --Whiteguru (talk) 00:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.