Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VetsNYC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VetsNYC[edit]

VetsNYC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable (WP:N). Quoted mention in NY Times is passing mention identifying a quoted person as working for the organization. There are other passing mentions of Riverside Animal Hospital as a location where animals were abandoned or taken for treatment, but the articles were not about VetsNYC or Riverside Animal Hospital itself. If WP:NHOSPITALS also applies to veterinary hospitals, then this page does not meet "notable hospital" criteria as there are no sources discussing the organization in-depth. DferDaisy (talk) 23:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 01:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete Even the passing mention in the NYT article isn't about the subject, it's about a hospital they acquired. Nearly CSD worthy. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails all notability guidelines by a wide margin. Rentier (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.