Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertu (collections)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Objet d'art#Objet de vertu. ✗plicit 05:49, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Vertu (collections)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vertu (collections) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD removed with no helpful rationale. WP:DICTDEF/WP:SUBSTUB. No indication the term has notability. The term is not mentioned at Emma, Lady Hamilton so redirecting is not a simple solution, merger is unlikely to make sense given this is just a term one person called her. BEFORE fails to find evidence of any significant usage of this term in English in other contexts anyway. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, there doesn't appear to be significant coverage of this term, some weak references [1][2], seems to be a shortened form of Objet_d'art#Objet_de_vertu. SailingInABathTub (talk) 08:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Topic is already covered at Objet_d'art#Objet_de_vertu so anything else could be merged but this this isn't a search term with the parenthetical. Reywas92Talk 22:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Objet_d'art#Objet_de_vertu. The coverage in the target is better than this article, which merely deals with an example of it. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Peterkingiron, As a nominator, I support a redirect, it makes sense. Thanks for finding a plausible target (also to User:Reywas92). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.