Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronika Sharametsyeva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:NCYC. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Veronika Sharametsyeva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. personal details not covered by source given but more likely from another source. Unreliable. The Banner talk 15:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I can verify every fact in that article from the sources given. The subject passes the subject notability guideline for cyclists at WP:NSPORT. Tazerdadog (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NCYC for women (2:competed at the Olympics or UCI World Championships or UCI World Cup), having rode at the 2005 UCI Road World Championships. All details are verfied and I've added another ref for her DOB. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 15:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep meets WP:NCYC. Hmlarson (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rider at the WC. Kante4 (talk) 15:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The article now reads as a WP:ONEEVENT-case. But I have no problem when somebody wants to have it userfied to be able to improve it. By the way, this article is part of User:Aymatth2/SvG clean-up. The Banner talk 15:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - By the way, for all the biographies you nominated last months you should have done WP:BEFORE. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 17:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - I think you really did not get the message that most of your articles will be mass deleted soon because of sourcing and other BLP-issues, don't you? But when you fail to write proper articles, why should I improve them? You are the author and your work is/was sloppy. Improve your own work instead of pointing to others as the culprits. The Banner talk 22:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - So that's another reason you didn't have to put this article for AfD. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 14:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        I should not put this article to AfD because you fail to write proper articles? Ow, goodie... The Banner talk 21:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        Thats not what I said. Like you were told many, many times read WP:BEFORE before nominating. Like for instance "The minimum search expected" and "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, using the advice in Wikipedia:How to cite sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern." Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        Like you were told many times before: do not blame others for your own sloppy work. You should have looked for more sources before writing the article. Not complaining afterwards when it breaches the BLP-rules. The Banner talk 17:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep meets WP:NCYC twice ( 1: competed at World Championships, 2: rode for an UCI women's team). Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.