Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronika Fašínová
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 10:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Veronika Fašínová[edit]
- Veronika Fašínová (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable. According to Fashion Model Directory, since competing in (and not placing in) the Elite contest over a decade ago, she has managed one magazine cover (not even a solo cover), two ads, and only a handful of runway appearances, mostly for non-notable designers. This is basically the fashion equivalent of an actor with a one-word role or two. Performed a brief search for good sources, but found mention in just a pair of blogs. Mbinebri talk ← 21:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google news turns up a photo credit, but the article isn't about her. It's just an incidental mention. Web results are directory entries and forum posts. No reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable model with magazine cover credit. Stub will be expanded. Esasus (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 01:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - It already looks like a consensus to me. Mbinebri talk ← 22:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems to fail WP:BIO. Stifle (talk) 11:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.