Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Roth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica Roth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. She wrote a best selling novel but notability is not inherited. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Plenty of reviews in reliable sources[1][2][3][4] and less notable sources[5][6][7][8] USA Today interview[9]. So many hits on Google and Google News. The nominator is proposing a lot of articles for deletion that are clearly notable and seems not to understand WP policies such as WP:BEFORE. --Colapeninsula (talk) 22:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She gets interviewed, and people talk about her work, so she is notable. Dream Focus 23:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Dream Focus 23:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can understand why someone would think that such a brief, poorly sourced article was ripe for the chop. But in actuality, notability is 'inherited' for creative professionals, as per WP:AUTHOR, point 3. So writing a very successful, well reviewed book makes Roth notable. Sionk (talk) 00:24, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Clearly meets GNG, I threw a few url cites into the article, there are tons to choose from. Another Bad Nomination From Alan Liefting, come on Alan, let's not make this your signature move.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 03:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Author a of a series that has been covered in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 16:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I've added the following sources to the article:

Crowder, Courtney (2012). "Chicago novelist sells film rights". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 13, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
Kung, Michelle (July 23, 2011). "'Divergent' Author Veronica Roth on Her Film Adaptation". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 13, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
"Divergent by Veronica Roth - review". The Guardian. September 13, 2011. Retrieved April 13, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep authors of course become notable by writing best selling novels (or other notable books) what on earth else would an author be notable for? the details of their personal life and such relative trivia? Following such reasoning, no person would be notable. This is an encyclopedia , and people's professional careers are what is most important about them. DGG ( talk ) 05:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.