Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vergi Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vergi Rodriguez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a singer, dancer, choreographer, actress that lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability. The article appears to be created by an agency related to the subject, and the accomplishments have been puffed up along with reference bombing. For example, the lead paragraph makes the claim for acting in the movie The Hot Chick which is technically true but the role is minor as one of four actors credited with being a "Palace Girl" according to IMDB. The references are numerous but consist of unreliable sources. My own searches turned up this, but that is not substantial, and is only one source. Whpq (talk) 20:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Former background dancer, has now put out a couple of songs on iTunes, although no one seems to have downloaded them. Article refs are side mentions or unreliable. Nothing better to be found in web searches. There is no substantial coverage from independent reliable sources to evidence notability. WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 16:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.