Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vere Claiborne Chappell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vere Claiborne Chappell[edit]

Vere Claiborne Chappell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Philosophy, United States of America, Massachusetts, and New York. UtherSRG (talk) 15:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Aside from this mention [1] I'm not seeing anything else. Timur9008 (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but move to Vere Chappell, the name under which he usually published. A pass of WP:NPROF 1c as the subject of a festschrift, Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappell (Broadview, 2008)[2]. There's an obituary in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association[3] and a number of book reviews[4][5][6] on JSTOR. (Additionally, for the use of future editors, there's an obituary of his ex-wife here[7] that contains more biographical information.) Note that the author of Sexual Outlaw, Erotic Mystic: The Essential Ida Craddock is apparently his son of the same name. Jahaza (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. A festschrift establishes notability.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 21:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.