Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venkat Selvamanickam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Venkat Selvamanickam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. The article relies on one reference which is primary. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. GS h-index of around 17 is a liitle on the low side for this average-cited field. The nomination could be made more explicit. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable. He is a reputed scientist and the Director of Texas Center for Superconductivity at University of Houston. --Tigerson1995 (talk) 04:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the subject passes WP:PROF#C5 for holding a chair appointment at a fairly major research university. The subject also passes WP:PROF#C6, for being the director of the Texas Center for Superconductivity, which from Physical Review affiliations I could find, is just as good a medium-sized research university. References being primary is no reason for deletion; tag it for cleanup. See WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. — Stringy Acid (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.