Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veloren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Veloren[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Videogame does not meet WP:NPRODUCT- coverage is largely fansites and WP:ROUTINE announcements. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:05, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not sure about this. It's a real thing, but no high-profile sources document it. «2nd|ias» 02:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Except for probably GamingOnLinux and even GitLab, on the arguable side. The latter is more likely higher-profile compared to the former. «2nd|ias» 02:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: GamingOnLinux is a sufficient source for an open-souce Linux game, keep in mind Linux is not as widely used as Windows and the level of coverage needs to be compared to other Linux games rather than other Windows games where the coverage will be expected to be much larger. Dr. Universe (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Gamingonlinux.com has already been assessed as unreliable and even if that consensus had reason to change, we would need at least several sources to constitute "significant coverage from multiple, reliable, independent sources". (?) The topic had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets (List of open-source video games only includes independently notable topics). If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 03:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the logic and links by Czar While there are several references on the page they do not qualify as WP:RS or they are primary. My search did not find anything to add. Jeepday (talk) 17:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.