Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veggetto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball#Vegetto --JForget 23:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Note: There was already a Vegetto entry that was redirected to the main article/section. I will though still keep the redirect article with the double G. --JForget 00:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Veggetto[edit]

Nonsense article. The name isn't even spelt correctly. Fails WP:ORIGINAL, WP:VERIFY, and WP:NOTE. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball#Vegetto since Vegetto already redirects there. DCEdwards ¹⁹⁶⁶ 20:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - article was created via a typo, and is reasonably assumed that more would make the same spelling error. Turlo Lomon (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for exactly the reason Turlo Lomon gives. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Redirect this is obvious. If not for the minor spelling change, it would have been exactly like the merged Vegetto. Redirect now and save us all the trouble of the AfD process. Sasuke9031 (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect This type of article that we should specifically avoid creating. Although it contains a relatively short character summary, beyond that, it is simply a list of "attacks" and "powers" which don't confer any information relative to the character's role in the plot or his real world relevance. This article is more in line of what you may expect on a fansite instead of in an encyclopedia. --Farix (Talk) 16:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.