Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegetarian Campaign Nepal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vegetarian Campaign Nepal[edit]

Vegetarian Campaign Nepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable organized event. First ref cited does not mention about this campaign, second has a just one line and third is primary source. Apart from this, unable to find any reliable sources on Google search. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • They are organizing various programs around Kathmandu valley and their significance can be easily traced being at Kathmandu. Rallys and miking with this campaign's name are done and they are teaming up with Hindu Awareness campaign to stop mass slaughter and other malpractices. I found a group on FB : https://www.facebook.com/groups/vegannepal/ --Esushant (talk) 08:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)-[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now and draft & userfy if needed as I simply found no better coverage and it's not surprising, considering this is only 5 months old. SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.