Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varun Sood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 20:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Varun Sood[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think it fails WP:NACTOR and written in promotional way. Princepratap1234 (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actor and VJ.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable as actor and VJ. Alexdlp10 (talk) 08:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete appeared in a couple of reality shows, hosted a few web series and various guest appearances, so iffy on meeting WP:NACTOR for me. Sourcing - there's a lot of sources, but not a lot that I thought were reall strong. Several interviews, many connected to the reality show appearances, some that are just passing mention. Ravensfire (talk) 16:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep or Draftify: The subject might just make it for WP:NACTOR; his IMDb profile shows a number of different projects. As for the sources, the ones in the article doesn't seem too bad—not all of them, anyway—and we could probably strengthen the WP:GNG argument. So, while it may be a bit WP:TOOSOON, I don't think deletion—or outright deletion—is necessary, and would suggest "draftifying" as an alternative. As an aside, I have no problem working on the actual text of the article to allay any concerns regarding a promotional tone. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.