Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Various artists (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to wikt:various artists. Xclamation point 00:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Various artists[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Various artists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was soft-redirected to Wiktionary back in September but undone. It is a sub-stub dicdef with no hope of expansion. I see no use in an article as it's a very much no-brainer definition. If soft-redirected again, I suggest a protected redirect. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert to soft-redirect, which is what I created it as, and protect. Stifle (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Redirect and protect. This has already been decided in the previous AfD and no reasons have been given as to why this should be changed. (The template I used on Seventysomething is the one I prefer.) Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.