Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanzetta Penn McPherson (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Vanzetta Penn McPherson[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vanzetta Penn McPherson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable United States magistrate judge. Per WP:USCJN#Magistrate judges and bankruptcy judges, "Magistrate judges... are not inherently notable, but holding such a position is evidence of notability that can be established by other strong indicia of notability."
The article was PRODded by Snickers2686 (myself) with the comment Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider/WP:USCJN; it was declined by 161.69.71.25 with the comment "literally first page of Google has tonnes of stuff, shared on talk page." The sources shared on article talk page don't constitute WP:RS or establish notability. Snickers2686 (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Law. Snickers2686 (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:52, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:52, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liamyangll (talk to me!) 01:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)- Delete We generally don't accept magistrate judges as notable, not a ton of coverage of the individual otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 12:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: per Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges/Notability guidelines and not finding anything substantive in a WP:BEFORE search on google scholar or news.
- TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 04:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.