Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Kaiser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vanessa Kaiser[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure this person complies WP:NPOL. They are just the councilor of a commune of Santiago. Being the sister of Axel Kaiser, the executive director of a libertarian think tank and a columnist of two newspapers do not make her any more notable. Bedivere (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think her primary claim to notability would be either WP:NAUTHOR, WP:NACADEMIC, or WP:JOURNALIST as opposed to NPOL. She has worked as a columnist with a notable paper, has authored two books, and is currently a named chair at Autonomous University of Chile. I would say she passes criteria 5 of NACADEMIC at the very least.4meter4 (talk) 20:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - primarily on the basis of 4m4's analysis. I can certainly understand the nomination here, but I think the subject probably just squeaks by. St★lwart¹¹¹ 04:18, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as she passes NACADEMIC.Jackattack1597 (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per above, passes WP:NACADEMIC.Brayan ocaner (talk) 21:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.