Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Cantave

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vanessa Cantave[edit]

Vanessa Cantave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable & promotional. Career consists of being a chef at an apparently non-notable catering company, competing once on one reality cooking program, appearing as a guest of various programs, and supporting to an unspecified extent a very minor charity--support for which for which there is no documentation except herself. Promotional content consists of 50% of the article on her school career and 50% name-dropping -- apparently trying to get notability on the basis of the notable people she cooked for , in which case every caterer in manhattan and brooklyn is probably notable References are all PR, mostly in publications not reliable for notability, the best of which is a interview on Fox Business Network. or both. DGG ( talk ) 17:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - The article is promotional and relies heavily on notability-by-association. JSFarman (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.