Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampirism Revolution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 15:08, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vampirism Revolution[edit]
Custom map in Warcraft 3. Completely non-notable in any way. —Cleared as filed. 23:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable WarCruft. --Kinu 23:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: welcome to the World of Warcuft -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 23:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Thesquire. Stifle 00:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to/Merge with Warcraft 3. Actually, there are a number of articles on custom maps in Warcraft 3 on Wikipedia. While this particular map may not be as popular as, say, Defense of the Ancients, it is still one of the more commonly played maps on Battle.net. IMHO, that makes it notable enough for at least a redirect, if the article is not to be kept. Alternatively, perhaps this article can be merged with the Warcraft 3 article, with content regarding this map added under the subsection "Custom Maps" in that article. Ikusawa 21:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Follow-up: I rewrote the entire article from scratch. The quality should now be on par with the other articles on Warcraft III custom maps. The article is by no means comprehensive (for one thing, the list of units and structures is incomplete), this is just to show what a cleaned up version of this article would look like. As a comparison, I also posted the version of the article that garnered the AfD nomination in the first place on the discussion page. Ikusawa 03:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and Merge with Warcraft 3 per Ikusawa - Dragoonmac - If there was a problem yo I'll solve it 01:06, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Johnleemk | Talk 14:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Johnleemk | Talk 14:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Article has been rewritten from scratch. Johnleemk | Talk 14:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the reasons above. The rewrite, although an obvious improvement, does not change the inherent non-notability of this subject. Savidan 15:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, popular Warcraft map. Kappa 09:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As I noted above, there are a number of articles on custom maps in Warcraft 3 on Wikipedia. As a map, Vampirism Revolution is at least as popular as Sheep Tag or Life of a Peasant -- my problem with the original article was quality, and not notability. Having said that, I think the rewrite also brings this article's quality up to a level on par with the other articles on Warcraft III custom maps. Ikusawa 01:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Kinu Ruby 02:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Ikusawa. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.