Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampireology: The True History of the Fallen Ones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ologies_(series). merge anything sources at your discretion Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vampireology: The True History of the Fallen Ones[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:

Does not meet notability criteria for books. I found 2 news reviews; one listed the book as one of a dozen or so similarly themed books, the other is a 2 paragraph online only review. Article should be redirected to series page (Ologies (series)). Qwyrxian (talk) 03:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I have added 4 other books from this series to this AfD. Essentially, its the 5 most recent books in this series that are being nominated. The first 4 books were all nominated for prizes or received significant reviews in general sources, and thus meet WP:NB. Essentially, it looks like the series started off being notable, but, over time, the individual books became less popular, at least in that they no longer get regular, independent reviews. As such, the above 4 books should be redirected to the series as a whole. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all to Ologies_(series). No justification for them all having seperate articles - they're just not sufficiently notable.--Korruski^Talk 11:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect all to Ologies_(series). Series is notable, but these individual books don't currently justify their own articles.--Arxiloxos (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to the series, merging any third-party sourced information. Sandstein 08:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.