Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valtira
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --- Deville (Talk) 02:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Valtira[edit]
This AFD was originally started by an IP: 24.7.25.122, but was incomplete. No reason was given, and it was the only contibution from that IP. Yomanganitalk 09:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. Lack of nomination reason implies that there is no reason. Valtira appears notable. Since this was "completed" procedurally, can we close it procedurally? Fiddle Faddle 09:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. You did not state your own reason for keeping the article. Citing that the article should be kept based on the "lack of nomination reason" isn't a very acceptable reason, either. --Nishkid64 18:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I said above Valtira appears notable. It does. Fiddle Faddle 18:16, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. You did not state your own reason for keeping the article. Citing that the article should be kept based on the "lack of nomination reason" isn't a very acceptable reason, either. --Nishkid64 18:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable, per WP:CORP. ColinFine 12:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It - spin off of JWT, has a number of important clients, and has had local media coverage Xinconnu 13:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Do you have any links to some of the media coverage? My searching only turned up a couple of mentions about executive hiring and reprints of press releases.
- Comment; it doesn't say that it's a spinoff of JWT, it says that it was founded by guys who had previously worked there. Church rummage sales get local media coverage but aren't notable. ergot 00:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - googling seems to suggest it's a non-notable company. MidgleyDJ 08:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This appears to be a flagrant violation of WP:N. Sound and Fury 00:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.