Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerie van der Graaf
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No consensus after being listed for three weeks. Last relist didn't result in any further input. Michig (talk) 07:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Valerie van der Graaf[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Valerie van der Graaf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
May meet NModel due to Playboy and SI Swimsuit, but I don’t think she meets GNG at this time. Lacks significant coverage. Trillfendi (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Definitely meets WP:NMODEL criteria #1, as SI and Playboy are quite notable. WP:GNG is tougher but she's been in several papers, like when she turned down Jon Snow at a party. [1] Ifnord (talk) 12:25, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- You and I both know that the Daily Mail is not a reliable source on Wikipedia. Even trying to put it in a ref tag is blocked. But then again many non-notable models have also been in Playboy or SI Swimsuit. I think GNG always takes precedence above all professions. That’s why I think it should be deleted until significant coverage happens. Trillfendi (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree re: the Daily Mail, which is why I did not add it to the article. But, when I went looking for sources, I found a ton of hits, mainly in Dutch. I had a hard time trying to see if any of them were reliable, Dutch not being a language I speak, but I suspect there's some. Ifnord (talk) 02:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have some basic understanding of Dutch, but I’m betting those sources probably don’t cut it because I tried looking at Dutch wiki’s article and it gave no sources at all.Trillfendi (talk) 03:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree re: the Daily Mail, which is why I did not add it to the article. But, when I went looking for sources, I found a ton of hits, mainly in Dutch. I had a hard time trying to see if any of them were reliable, Dutch not being a language I speak, but I suspect there's some. Ifnord (talk) 02:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- You and I both know that the Daily Mail is not a reliable source on Wikipedia. Even trying to put it in a ref tag is blocked. But then again many non-notable models have also been in Playboy or SI Swimsuit. I think GNG always takes precedence above all professions. That’s why I think it should be deleted until significant coverage happens. Trillfendi (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.