Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentine One

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice if someone wants to make a redirect after deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valentine One[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very promotional and does not appear to be notable Abote2 (talk) 12:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to Radar detector. All the current references lead to manufacturer's own site so it gives a strong impression that the article was created by manufacturer to advertise their own product, this type of content obviously does not belong on Wikipedia. In an addition to that, there's absolutely no good way to improve such article (same goes for every other product by different radar detector brand, such as Escort, Radenso, Uniden and others) because these products are only relevant to a very small amount of enthusiasts so most of the useful product information (including detailed, up-to-date tests/comparisons) can only be found on such enthusiast's forums, YouTube channels and personal blogs and such sources aren't considered "reliable". Also, after looking at this article's history I have noticed that it has already been proposed for deletion back in 2009, and while the proposal was removed by some editor on the same day - that editor also failed to properly improve this article, for the same reason I've stated above. So it's better to just either remove this (and any similar future articles related to different brands of radar detectors) article completely or make a redirect to a general Radar detectors article.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Radar detector. Suprised it is non notable. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not for product brochures.--Rpclod (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.