Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentina Azarova (academic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valentina Azarova (academic)[edit]

Valentina Azarova (academic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Keep Meets WP:GNG. Lots of coverage including that cited in the article. (t · c) buidhe 10:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
in the article NO.--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Women. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep She is notable, as any WP:BEFORE type search makes clear. CT55555 (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. While the subject is mainly notable for a single event (the rescinding of the job offer at U Toronto), the coverage was substantial and over the period of at least a year or so. I think it's enough to meet the significant coverage standard of WP:BLP1E. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.