Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vakayil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily userfy to user:Thobias vakayil. Just zis Guy you know? 21:45, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vakayil[edit]

Deprodded without comment. A family history of some people, who haven't asserted to be notable, contains some interesting stuff way back to the BC era, but it is unsourced and could possibly be aggrandizement. ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 00:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, pure vanity: We can not include all details of our family members here. -- ReyBrujo 02:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "unreferenced and unverifiable random family history" pretty much covers it. Eldereft 03:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, self-admitted vanity article. JIP | Talk 07:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. First para copyvio from [1]. Next one copied and pasted from Nedumpally#Conversion_of_Nedumpally_Brahmins. Third para from [2]. The last three lines about the family are probably author's original work. Google doesn't know who Vayakil Chakku is. utcursch | talk 07:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 12:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity. --Tango 18:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN --Bachrach44 19:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.