Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadim Zubavlenko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 13:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vadim Zubavlenko[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quite frankly, the article fails the WP:GNG test despite passing WP:NFOOTY as I got no results for this player. HawkAussie (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NFOOTY. Subject is 21 years and currently playing for a club in a fully professional league and has played in the current season with his last apperance on 1st August 2020 and is part of the current team.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Already passes WP:NFOOTY, I've snooped around and found videos of this guy. There are also news articles in Russian, so this does passes WP:GNG. Neverbuffed (talk) 17:32, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets NFOOTBALL with ongoing career. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 21:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - he just about passes NFOOTBALL; if he doesn't make any further appearances and retires then it might be worth bringing this back for further discussion but I see no reason to delete the article when he still has an active career Spiderone 22:35, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.