Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadde raju

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vadde raju[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

India caste. No references. According to a couple of unreliable blogs, they are the same as the Raju. Bgwhite (talk) 05:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks to me that they are also the same as Vaddera (alternatively Vadde, Vadderaju or Waddera). Is this true? Do we have three articles on the same people? If so, then Merge would seem sensible. Dcs002 (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's get the expert, Oh Sitush..... Bgwhite (talk) 05:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Trying one more relist, in the hopes of getting someone familiar with Indian castes Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.