Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vacuums
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, but redirect to Vacuums (film). soum talk 07:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vacuums[edit]
No assertion or evidence of Notability. Article is a single sentence. Fails WP:N. The Parsnip! 18:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- what does the proposed redirect have to do with the subject of the article under discussion (not to mention that the word is not used in the plural except as an abbreviation for vacuum cleaners?)DGG 02:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It was more of an agree to delete, but then redirect to vacuum- and vacuum can be plural when you're talking about multiple vacuums, right? (as in the absence of air, which is what I think vacuum is describing). Or was I way off? It happens sometimes. I guess I just assumed vacuums could be a plural, or at least a plausible typo? (considering I made it!) -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 03:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, it seems vacua already redirects to vacuum, and both that and vacuums are plurals of vacuum (according to the dictionary). -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 03:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- what does the proposed redirect have to do with the subject of the article under discussion (not to mention that the word is not used in the plural except as an abbreviation for vacuum cleaners?)DGG 02:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Am I missing something here, or is this a film produced by Quincy Jones and starring Chevy Chase? And if so, wouldn't that make it notable? Maxamegalon2000 05:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reliable sources reinforce notability, its not inherited from people associated with it. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 05:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm not voting here, but if the article does get kept, it should be moved to vacuums (film) and vacuums redirected to vacuum. Anonymous Dissident Utter 11:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 18:44, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 22:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand, notable film, move to Vacuums (film). Corvus cornix 22:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, very few and trivial mentions of film in Google News Archive. Apparently it's a direct-to-video (intentionally or not) follow-up to Stomp Out Loud, the first movie about Stomp (dance troupe). Alternately, merge to one of those. --Dhartung | Talk 23:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and move to Vacuums (film). I disagree with wizzard2k; Chevy Chase and Quincey Jones' involvement does elevate it to notability. Clarityfiend 05:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, expand and move to Vacuums (film) - as per Clarityfriend and Corvus cornix. (Discussion as to redirection seems to be a result of misunderstanding.) Pever 00:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.