Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V ammo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 04:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
V ammo[edit]
This is a contested PROD entry. The article goes into great detail, but basically explains how to use a rubber band to flick a piece of paper at someone. This is not encyclopedic. Joyous | Talk 22:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unencyclopedic. Feezo (Talk) 22:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as very non-notable mischief cruft. --Fuhghettaboutit 23:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Henning Makholm 06:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, nn cruft. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 05:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move/Rename/or Merge I like it. It describes something real, that can really be done. The only unencyclopedic part is perhaps the title, which is probably made up. This isn't Encyclopaedia Britanica for gods sake, don't be so uptight. Consider merging this with Origami, Spit Ball, or Paper Airplane. Tiki God 12:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Edit It's written as a "How-to", it should be re-done so that article seems more factual. Dom Beaudoin 01:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Techfan 01:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's no encyclopedic topic here. Rossami (talk) 03:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No delete This is a real game there are clubs for it across canada so it has the right to be an article and to all the losers that blocked me just a note that i can change my ip so blocking me does nothing so please stop it just makes you look stupid.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.63.173 (talk • contribs)
- No delete This is a real game. It is played in Ontario, if this isnt what wikipedia is than it does not take the truth.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.63.173 (talk) 00:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.