Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V (programming language) (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 05:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

V (programming language)[edit]

V (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per this message by North8000 on article's talk page. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC) [revised 18:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)][reply]

I had wiki-trouble and folks helped by creating this 4th nomination and also added a CSD. Reviewed under new article curation process. No indication of wp:notability. Actually zero coverage by independent sources in the references given in the article (which aren't actually references) , and I found none in a search except some notes in blogs. Article was previously deleted twice (the 2nd closed on Fen 25th 2020) and then immediately created Feb 25th upon deletion. Possibly it should be a speedy closed and salted.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/V_(programming_language)_(3rd_nomination) and note that it was concurrently nominated for speedy deletion by Tyw7 per North8000's request. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC) Problem resolved. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for technical reasons
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 18:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I knew I recognized this from somewhere; turns out I commented in the previous AfD, 4 months ago. This is a complete rewrite, so WP:G4 doesn't apply. But it suffers from exactly the same problem as the previous version; no WP:RS. Every one of the references are to vlang's own websites or closely related such as github and patreon. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.