Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VS (Playstation One Game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per nomination withdrawl JForget 01:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Also the article was moved without mention here to Vs. (video game) --JForget 01:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VS (Playstation One Game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly written with no citations and nothing I can find showing notability. I'd tagged it with PROD, but the article creator removed it (so far, with no explanation). Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 01:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Taelus (talk) 10:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Following sources, unsure if they provide enough notability, but thought I would add in anyway.
Release information, screenshot and brief description

Gamerankings, reviewed by 7 relatively notable groups

Hope this helps, --Taelus (talk) 11:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – that GameRankings link shows a good amount of significant coverage that can establish sufficient notability. MuZemike 17:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Appears to be enough coverage to establish notability. The IGN review doesn't provide a lot of information, but it should be enough to make a stub. Obviously the game's title will make it difficult to find additional information, but there are six other reviews listed on GameRankings that could be used as sources. Reach Out to the Truth 05:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found. Tag this one with lots of mx tags. --Teancum (talk) 23:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Given the current consensus and the improvement of the article (however minor), I'm considering withdrawing the nomination. I won't withdraw it yet until either a) the article is significantly improved or b) any editor agrees that I should withdraw. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 23:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Like 99% of PS1 games this one is within the sourcing black hole - it was released before the internet became the source of game reviews it is today and yet is too young for the numerous magazine scan databases (World of Spectrum, Amiga Magazine Rack, Mean Machines etc). This is a mainstream non-budget game released during the console's active life, it will be reviewed in numerous magazines, it's just that those magazines are not readily available to source with. In addition to the IGN review there's some info on allgame, which should be enough to tide it over, surely? I'll try to tweak and cite the article. Someone another 13:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did what I could, couldn't figure out what to do with the in-universe character info so I just replaced it. Would rather not have, but couldn't see what else to do with it. Someone another 14:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination Withdrawn: Unless there are any objections, this looks far better now. --Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.