Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VOR Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

VOR Technology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage in unrelated reliable sources, doesn't satisfy WP:N. Being #498 on a list of fastest growth (which could mean, for example, rising from one-millionth to one-two hundred thousandth) isn't inherently notable. Largoplazo (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 00:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 00:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 00:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. 9 refs none of which support notability, they are routine company listings, trivial, unrelated or 404. Szzuk (talk) 21:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.