Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIW

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing as keep as nobody is now arguing for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VIW[edit]

VIW (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Senseless disambiguation page. The Vulcan article doesn't even mention the VIW acronym, the VIW law enforcement acronym is a single mention in a list of jargon and the radio station is a mention of a 1914 station in the history of broadcasting in Australia. A page with no useful content or purpose. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I am very confused by the nomination statement. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 06:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I got my redirects and disambiguations mixed up there. This is a useless disambiguation page - it disambiguates three phrases that do not relate to articles or phrases in common usage. Does that help, t? BestAlexandermcnabb (talk) 07:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 06:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Striking this nomination, just realised better as speedy G14. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.