Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uviwe Jikwa (mixtape)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete WP:A9 after the artist's article was deleted by consensus. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uviwe Jikwa (mixtape)[edit]

Uviwe Jikwa (mixtape) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another mixtape by a non-notable artist whose article is also at AFD. A9 doesn't apply because the article exists, although it will once that article is deleted. Tazerdadog (talk) 00:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - it's NOT an A9. The artiste currently has an article (also at AfD). While that article exists, A9 is out of the question. A9 depends on non-notable recording AND artiste without article. Peridon (talk) 11:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
While it's not an A9 candidate right now, we are probably already at the point where we should invoke the snowball clause, and move on with more productive matters.Tazerdadog (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lemongirl942 – "unsourced CRYSTALBALL"... that probably makes it more of a WP:CLOUDYBALL. But yes, delete for failing WP:NALBUM, WP:TOOSOON, WP:GNG and probably a few others as well. Richard3120 (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, promotion, no independent coverage. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.