Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utrom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Since the content presently has no sources, it is inappropriate to merge at this time. I will userfy later to anyone who promises to source the material. Xoloz (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Utrom

Utrom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article lacks notability and referencing, and is just an in-universe plot repetition of the various appearances in the various TMNT stories. It is just duplication of the plot section of the various TMNT articles and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep and improve This article does duplicate a lot of content from other articles, and some of this content should be trimmed, but it is worth keeping since it documents the development of the species as the brand developed. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 00:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
  • You haven't shown, because you have failed to cite any sources at all, that that documentation is not original research and that it is even possible to keep and improve such an article whilst sticking to Wikipedia's content policies. Sources! Sources! Sources! Arguments without them don't hold water. Uncle G (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

• If sources are impossible to find (and I'm having some trouble myself :-/) then it should be deleted. Content is already duplicated in other relevant articles. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 15:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

• The subject isn't notable. So I'd redirect it to TMNT. I suppose the history could be left in tact to use for merging. I (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge Appears notable within the TMNT universe, but if sources cannot be found, it should be merged. --Sharkface217 02:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.