Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utopia (Tom Dice song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep Yasht101 13:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
Utopia (Tom Dice song)[edit]
- Utopia (Tom Dice song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSONGThis article is a stub that should be deleted, as it is for a non notable, iTunes only single. In it's current state it is a list of technical information about the single and lacks any statement or prose as to it's notability and provides no information that could not be found via the album page. It's charting is a minor regional statistic, if it were on a top EU chart, I would not have nominated it. Newmanoconnor (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - the song has charted and, therefore, passes WP:NSONG. SplashScreen (talk) 11:43, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - Song has been ranked on national or significant music chart, therefore, passes WP:NSONG. Greenock125 (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Again charting is not sufficient to have a standalone article. This article provides no information about what makes it significant, is a stub list of technical info, that will likely remain as such.In these cases the article should be merged to the album or artist page, or deleted. While the UltraTop 50 is the national chart for Belgium singles, I would hardly call it significant rank at 23 on that small chart, in today's music ecosystem.Newmanoconnor (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Song has charted on the Ultratop chart, even if it is not top 10.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I thought this was an Ultratip not Ultratop chart reference, I'd like to change my rationale to merge, if you feel the AfD should be closed keep and a mere tag placed I can understand that, but I wish you all would really look at this article, and where it charted, it doesn't justify a standalone article under WP:NSONG. Stuff like this just encourages paid editing for singlesNewmanoconnor (talk) 19:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Ultratip is a valid chart, and the sources for some of these charts is considered reliable, and the chart is not inclued on the WP:BADCHARTS. Greenock125 (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Passes WP:NSONG with a position on a national music chart. The Steve 07:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.