Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uthgar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uthgar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Forgotten Realms through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of unnecessary plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 20:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. BOZ (talk) 00:14, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Forgotten Realms deities. Non-notable cruft better suited to Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. Web Warlock (talk) 01:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
transwiki to some fanboy site that loves trivia. The only sources are primary so the article fails WP:N and should either be deleted or if there is appropriate target, merge any appropriate content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please remain civil. 'Fanboy' is a pejorative term and is entirely unnecessary and gratuitous in the context of your statement. Jclemens (talk) 06:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.