Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Use your imagination, PBS Kids and You!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Core desat 04:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use your imagination, PBS Kids and You![edit]

This is an article about a PBS Kids tagline sentence, which is not even remotely encyclopedic. Keeping this would be akin to having articles for every single solitary insignificant catchphrase for every single advertisement in history. There is no room for expansion of this article into anything that would be useful--currently it is a list of three local variants of the same sentence. I never thought I'd see PBScruft, but here it is. Gladys J Cortez 03:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete um...PBScruft indeed, fails WP:N spectacularly. Drop a dead cow on it. Doc Strange (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Nonsense. Undeath (talk) 05:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it's perfectly coherent; just abjectly, utterly useless. I'm still stunned by its very existence, truth to tell.Gladys J Cortez 07:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a slogan, not a topic in itself. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per A3. No content other than a rephrasing of the title. --L. Pistachio (talk) 08:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless information. Certainly doesn't warrant its own article. By no means a notable phrase.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per above; absolutely uninformative and unmemorable. If it becomes a household slogan like "You deserve a break today" or "Winston tastes good like a cigarette should", we'll talk. -- azumanga (talk) 20:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources to establish notability. If at least somewhat notable, merge in to PBS otherwise delete. --Hdt83 ^Chat 02:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please, for the love of all that's good and holy in this world, let's NOT merge it. (We've been fighting a sockfarm who insists on adding every individual PBSKids tagline and ident, in intimate detail, to the article...like, including the "doink!" noise...and I'd rather not set a precedent that would offer him even the most fragile, tenuous foothold to claim notability.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gladys j cortez (talk • contribs) 03:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.